<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="todaycom/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Target ICL?</title>
	<link>http://cricket24x7.today.com/2009/02/16/why-target-icl/</link>
	<description>Cricket With Keyboard and Brains Only</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://www.today.com/version-2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: anIndian</title>
		<link>http://cricket24x7.today.com/2009/02/16/why-target-icl/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>anIndian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cricket24x7.today.com/2009/02/16/why-target-icl/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Yes, I thought BCCI went over the board on the issue related to ICL. They should have left it alone. It is an unofficial tournament involving players without compromising on their national duties. So, ICL is something like street cricket or club-level cricket. What is BCCI or any other boards have to worry about?

In fact, if I am not wrong, the Twenty20 club format was first introduced by ICL even before IPL. BCCI treated Kapil Dev like a criminal for being part of ICL. Really bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I thought BCCI went over the board on the issue related to ICL. They should have left it alone. It is an unofficial tournament involving players without compromising on their national duties. So, ICL is something like street cricket or club-level cricket. What is BCCI or any other boards have to worry about?</p>
<p>In fact, if I am not wrong, the Twenty20 club format was first introduced by ICL even before IPL. BCCI treated Kapil Dev like a criminal for being part of ICL. Really bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


