<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="todaycom/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for CRICKET ONLY &amp; ONLY CRICKET</title>
	<link>http://cricket24x7.today.com</link>
	<description>Cricket With Keyboard and Brains Only</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://www.today.com/version-2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Target ICL? by anIndian</title>
		<link>http://cricket24x7.today.com/2009/02/16/why-target-icl/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>anIndian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cricket24x7.today.com/2009/02/16/why-target-icl/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Yes, I thought BCCI went over the board on the issue related to ICL. They should have left it alone. It is an unofficial tournament involving players without compromising on their national duties. So, ICL is something like street cricket or club-level cricket. What is BCCI or any other boards have to worry about?

In fact, if I am not wrong, the Twenty20 club format was first introduced by ICL even before IPL. BCCI treated Kapil Dev like a criminal for being part of ICL. Really bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I thought BCCI went over the board on the issue related to ICL. They should have left it alone. It is an unofficial tournament involving players without compromising on their national duties. So, ICL is something like street cricket or club-level cricket. What is BCCI or any other boards have to worry about?</p>
<p>In fact, if I am not wrong, the Twenty20 club format was first introduced by ICL even before IPL. BCCI treated Kapil Dev like a criminal for being part of ICL. Really bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Strauss Doesn&#8217;t Want To Risk A Follow-on???? by Thomas Rooney</title>
		<link>http://cricket24x7.today.com/2009/02/18/67/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Rooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cricket24x7.today.com/2009/02/18/67/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Bad decisions have been made, but this was not one of them. Flintoff and Harmison were shattered and it would have been no good spening another day in the field straight away.

The problems in this match were - taking too long before declaring and using Jimmy Anderson as a nightwatchman when England needed to get on with things.

Top site by the way. Would you be able to email me when you get the chance?  I have something I would like to run by you.

Thanks a lot,

Thomas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad decisions have been made, but this was not one of them. Flintoff and Harmison were shattered and it would have been no good spening another day in the field straight away.</p>
<p>The problems in this match were - taking too long before declaring and using Jimmy Anderson as a nightwatchman when England needed to get on with things.</p>
<p>Top site by the way. Would you be able to email me when you get the chance?  I have something I would like to run by you.</p>
<p>Thanks a lot,</p>
<p>Thomas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


